In this article, we will disclose the world of the brain being the main organ of learning. Let’s first go back to our childhood, in which we experienced stimuli as a baby, asked “why?” as a toddler and built solutions as a child between 6 and 10 years old. These three stages are reflected in the building blocks of the brain (sensory neurons, interneurons and motor neurons) and in how we learn: by sensing, thinking and doing. Or as David Kolb put it into in his learning cycle: we need a concrete experience to start reflective observation and abstract conceptualization that result in active experimentation.
As long as game-based learning (GBL) is integrated in the flow of educational stimuli, it ‘fits’ with the sensing-thinking-doing functioning of the nervous system. GBL also fits with the natural ‘needs’ of the brain. The first need of the brain is to survive and therefore to be in control. The second need of the brain is to feel good and therefore to have fun, to play and to be rewarded. The third need of the brain is to save energy and therefore to make things logic and congruent. Game based learning makes the brain feel in control, it offers fun, play and reward, and it fits with the need to save energy by having a congruent story.
Besides the natural fit of game-based learning with the ‘needs’ of the brain, we can also look at what GBL actually does in the brain by taking different perspectives:
From a neuroscientific perspective, is game based learning better than other ways of learning? Well, it depends. First of all, there has to be a balance between receiving and using knowledge: when playing games all day students would just be exhausted. Therefore, the factor ‘human’ – or more specific: the factor ‘teacher’ – must never be overlooked. It’s up to the teacher to enable game-based learning and to react to what happens in the student’s brain. The results of GBL also depend on the context in which a game is played. Not only the colour, but the whole design (e.g. the number of stimuli appearing simultaneously on the screen and the complexity of each stimulus) of a game influences the outcomes of game-based learning. And also important: system failures are killing the positive attitude of students towards a game and therefore have a negative impact on learning. Moreover, in GBL there’s no ‘one size fits all’. Not each challenge works for each student, also because of the variety in learning styles. The neural responses to educational stimuli show variability: people differ.
Game-based learning must be like a James Bond movie: dosing with tension and excitement, charmingly overcoming challenges, but also room for relaxation and social interaction. Or to end with a quote from Jan L. Plas (Professor Envisioning, Designing, and Studying the Future of Digital Learning at New York University): “Good games aim for the ‘sweet spot’, where players can succeed but only with some struggle.”
Watch here the full webinar of Eveline van Zeeland presentation during the Inchainge Connect Educator Conference about this topic.
Explore game-based learning with our business simulation games:
Bateman & Nacke (2010). The neurobiology of play. ACM Future Play.
Cowley & Ravaja (2014). Learning in balance: using oscillatory EEG biomarkers of attention, motivation and vigilance to interpret game-based learning. Cogent Education.
Dale et al (2020). A new look at the cognitive neuroscience of video game play. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Decety et al (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage.
Friedlander et al (2011). What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Academic Medicine.
Gherlescu & Muntean (2014). A novel sensor-based methodology for leaner’s motivation analysis in game-based learning. Interacting with Computers.
Goswami (2006). Neuroscience and Education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Goswami (2008). Principles of Learning, Implications for Teaching: a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education
Hamari et al (2016). Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior.
Kätsyri et al (2013). The opponent matters: elevated fMRI reward responses to winning against a human versus a computer opponent during interactive video game playing. Cerebral Cortex.
Meier et al (2012). Color in Context: Psychological context moderates the influence of red on approach- and avoidance motivated behavior. PlosOne
Mullins & Sabherwal (2020). Gamification: a cognitive-emotional view. Journal of Business Research
Nabar et al (2018). Gamification or Gaming Techniques Applied to Pedagogy: Foundations of the Cognitive Neuroscience Applied to the Education. Global Journal of Human Social Science: Linguistics and Education
Ninaus et al (2019). Increased emotional engagement in game-based learning – a machine-learning approach on facial emotion detection data. Computers and Education
Palaus et al (2017). Neural basis of video gaming: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Plass et al (2015). Foundations of Games-Based Learning. Educational Psychologist
Ramsey et al (2021). Watch and learn: the cognitive neuroscience of learning from others’ actions. Trends in Neurosciences.
Yeh et al (2014). How stress influences creativity in game-based situations. Computers and Education
Zull, J. (2002). The art of changing the brain. Stylus Publishing.